28. “Chemical” doesn’t mean “toxic”

http://www.salon.com/2013/03/10/chemical_is_not_a_bad_word_partner/

  In Dorea Reeser's article, "'Chemical' doesn’t mean 'toxic'," she defines the word chemical. Reeser begins her article by stating the stereotypical meaning of the word chemical, which is normally thought as something bad or toxic. She defends chemicals by saying that it is part of everyone and she lists examples of things that are made of chemicals, such as people themselves. Reeser reveals that everything in the world is made of chemicals and people would not be here if not for the chemicals. She  refers to a organization, which protects the word chemical by showing how it is important for society. She also talks about sentences which misuse the word chemical, like "the growth of] crops without the use of chemicals, compounds or animal inputs of any kind.” If it wasn't for the chemicals, no crop would exist. She ends her article by showing the real importance of chemicals and stating that they deserve respect for everyone.

  The author's purpose was to define the word chemical and to teach people how to correctly use the term. Reeser shows how people normally have a misconception. Her article is a definition essay where she defines a specific word. Her tone throughout the article is both serious and informal. She talks with the audience, who are people interested in science, as if they were friends. She uses a conversational tone and teaches people what chemicals are and how they are part of people's lives. She refers to organization and reliable sources to prove her point of view. Reeser is able persuade the reader to learn the real meaning and use of chemicals. She ends her article by saying, "Chemicals deserve respect and appreciation because whether or not you want to admit it your friends are chemicals!" The author clearly shows her thoughts regarding chemicals.