Steve Lohr, The New York Times' "Business" columnist, writes an article about the accusations Apple makes about Samsung copying ideas from Apple and using them as theirs. The courtroom confrontation it is scheduled on Monday, Apple states that Samsung has copied Apple's ideas such as the old iPhone versions with the Galaxy S and the iPad with the Galaxy Tab and Galaxy Tab 10.1. Famous designers had warned Samsung the Galaxy S was too similar to the Apple iPhone, but the designers explained that the Galaxy S is suppose to resemble the iPhone “[a]ll you have to do is cover up the Samsung logo and it’s difficult to find anything different from the iPhone.” (PX47 at 27) Steve Lohr quotes Apple's brief. In Samsung's brief says that Apple wants to suspend Samsung from the market for copying Apple's ideas, which they borrowed from Sony. After Steve Jobs had a meeting with the designers of Sony, it is stated in Samsung's brief that immediately after the meeting Shin Nishibori, Apple's industrial designer, was requested to design a Sony-like device for Apple. Concluding Samsung's brief, it states that Apple is accusing Samsung for having a similar replica ideas from Apple, which they had borrowed from Sony and so states the idea of the iPhone was not originally from Apple.
Steve Lohr's purpose for writing this article to inform the readers about the rivalry going between two great technology distributors companies, Apple and Samsung. The author's main subject concentrates between the two companies' brief for the courtroom confrontation. Steve seems to show a very formal type of writing to match with his subject to seem more appropriate to the article.
-"Steve Lohr, The New York Times' "Business" columnist"
ReplyDelete-*- should be "a New York Times"
-" courtroom confrontation it is scheduled"
-* Should be "confrontation is scheduled"
- Overall, fair summary of the article, but.. you need to write more about what devices the author used in the article and less summary of the article. Ideally, your second paragraph should be longer in content and focus than your summary paragraph.