In this article, W. Bradford Wilcox discusses the role of fathers in today's society. Most of the article revolves around him stating data that overwhelmingly prove that having a father is crucial for kids to develop into health adults. He cites several studies that prove this, such as a Princeton study that said that man who were raised without fathers are 3 times more likely to go to jail by the time they reach 30.
The author's purpose was to prove that fathers still have a crucial role. He says that in today's society where single moms are becoming more common, the father's rule is being thought of as not so important. In this article, he proves that that notion is wrong, that fathers are extremely important for boys and girls alike.
Friday, June 7, 2013
37.Ownership of Genes Stops Research
In this article, Shobita Parthasarathy explains how patents on genes harms research. She uses the company called Myriad as her main example. Myriad is a company that carries out gene research that has patents on the BRCA gene, an important gene that causes different diseases when mutated. Since Myriad holds patents on this gene, it becomes extremely difficult for other companies to conduct research. This severely stalls progress because only virtually only one company has access to the gene.
The author's main purpose was to denounce the company Myriad for its practices and to question companies abilities to hold patents on genes. The author claims that if this practice becomes common place, it could pose severe problems on medical and biological research later on.
The author's main purpose was to denounce the company Myriad for its practices and to question companies abilities to hold patents on genes. The author claims that if this practice becomes common place, it could pose severe problems on medical and biological research later on.
Thursday, June 6, 2013
39. Drowning Doesn't Look Like Drowning
http://www.slate.com/articles/health_and_science/family/2013/06/rescuing_drowning_children_how_to_know_when_someone_is_in_trouble_in_the.html
In this article, Mario Vittone informs that it is difficult to notice when people are drowing, and presents the indications that a person might be drowning. As his introduction, he narrates a short recall of a story in which a lifeguard captain had saved a child from drowning while her parents had not noticed though they were less than 10 feet away from her. Vittone explains that when people actually drown, it rarely looks like the splashing and calling for help as they do in movies. Vittone refers to the theory of Francesco A. Pia, Ph.D, called "Instinctive Drowning Response" which involves no spashes, no calling for help nor any waving of the arms or legs. This reference provides a supporting evidence to his thesis through mentioning a professional in the topic. Statistics are also used to emphasize the magnitude of the problem of not being able to notice someone drowning. Vittone then listst the descriptions of the Instinctive Drowning Response as previously presented in Dr. Pia's article in the Coast Guard's On Scene magazine. In his conclusion, Vittone states, in summary, that "sometimes the most common indication that someone is drowning is that they don't look like they're drowning."
Mario Vittone's intended audience for this article is anyone with minimum to medium education, especially adults. The purpose Vittone put into the article is to inform many people for greater safety and less accidents of drowning children right infront of the parents. Vittone successfully accomplishes his purpose using references to professionals and the technique of listing.
In this article, Mario Vittone informs that it is difficult to notice when people are drowing, and presents the indications that a person might be drowning. As his introduction, he narrates a short recall of a story in which a lifeguard captain had saved a child from drowning while her parents had not noticed though they were less than 10 feet away from her. Vittone explains that when people actually drown, it rarely looks like the splashing and calling for help as they do in movies. Vittone refers to the theory of Francesco A. Pia, Ph.D, called "Instinctive Drowning Response" which involves no spashes, no calling for help nor any waving of the arms or legs. This reference provides a supporting evidence to his thesis through mentioning a professional in the topic. Statistics are also used to emphasize the magnitude of the problem of not being able to notice someone drowning. Vittone then listst the descriptions of the Instinctive Drowning Response as previously presented in Dr. Pia's article in the Coast Guard's On Scene magazine. In his conclusion, Vittone states, in summary, that "sometimes the most common indication that someone is drowning is that they don't look like they're drowning."
Mario Vittone's intended audience for this article is anyone with minimum to medium education, especially adults. The purpose Vittone put into the article is to inform many people for greater safety and less accidents of drowning children right infront of the parents. Vittone successfully accomplishes his purpose using references to professionals and the technique of listing.
38. Meet North Korea's New Girl-Pop Band
http://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2013/05/meet-north-koreas-new-girl-pop-band/276360/
Olga Khazan's article, "Meet North Korea's New Girl-Pop Band," informs about the new kind of entertainment culture in North Korea that Kim Jong Eun is allowing for the people and ponders that his purposes could be to distract the people from the faime and from the smuggled pieces of entertainment from the outside world such as the South Korean dramas. To show the audience what she is talking about, Khazan provides a video of the MoranBong Band. She quotes the North Korean news agency for ethos and briefly describes the video in a satiristic tone. In getting to her point, Khazan states that pop music plays a big role in the regime's indoctrination of its citizens, especially when there is famine in the land. Khazan then concludes with the claim that perhaps the MoranBong band was created by Kim Jong Il to let the North Korean people to have entertainment from within so that they would not secretly get peeks of the outer world.
The intended audience of this article is the general public with medium education and a general background knowledge about North Korea's communist impact on the people. Olga Khazan's purpose in this article is to inform the Western world of what is going around in North Korea, especially in terms of popular culture. She also focuses on implying the injustice and oppression of the regime on the people by hinting that the regime constantly tries to block information of the outside world and to placate its citizens. Khazan successfully reaches her purpose using a satiristic and informative tone while referring to other sources for support.
Olga Khazan's article, "Meet North Korea's New Girl-Pop Band," informs about the new kind of entertainment culture in North Korea that Kim Jong Eun is allowing for the people and ponders that his purposes could be to distract the people from the faime and from the smuggled pieces of entertainment from the outside world such as the South Korean dramas. To show the audience what she is talking about, Khazan provides a video of the MoranBong Band. She quotes the North Korean news agency for ethos and briefly describes the video in a satiristic tone. In getting to her point, Khazan states that pop music plays a big role in the regime's indoctrination of its citizens, especially when there is famine in the land. Khazan then concludes with the claim that perhaps the MoranBong band was created by Kim Jong Il to let the North Korean people to have entertainment from within so that they would not secretly get peeks of the outer world.
The intended audience of this article is the general public with medium education and a general background knowledge about North Korea's communist impact on the people. Olga Khazan's purpose in this article is to inform the Western world of what is going around in North Korea, especially in terms of popular culture. She also focuses on implying the injustice and oppression of the regime on the people by hinting that the regime constantly tries to block information of the outside world and to placate its citizens. Khazan successfully reaches her purpose using a satiristic and informative tone while referring to other sources for support.
39. Samsung May Have Passed Apple in U.S. — for Now
In this article, Brian X. Chen writes about the possibility that Samsung Electronics market has surpassed Apple market. In the beginning of the article he explains that it is mostly because of the new phone, Galaxy s4, combination of Galaxy Note II and S3. Then he continues writing the article by quoting Michael Walkley, the Canaccord Genuity analyst. Walkley claims that for the first time since Iphone 5 was launched, the Samsung market is on the top. However, the writer states that the research that was made does not include information about Apple market, and for this reason, explains that it is just a possibility and not a proven fact.He also states that this research represents strong performance in May, and it does not mean that the Samsung market has surpassed Apple market. Then Chen ends the article by explaining the strategies Samsung used to sell more of their products. They made good use of the months between Iphone upgrades, and they have taken more advantage of the predictability of the Iphone release cycle.
The purpose of this article is to inform the readers about the Samsung Eletrocnis that may have surpassed Apple Market in the month of May. In order to do that effectively, the writer includes several rhetorical devices in the article. First of all, the most noticeable device is allusion, when he quotes Michael Walkley, the Canaccord Genuity analyst. It gives more credibility to the article, and it shows the reader that his argument is supported by an expert. Besides that, he uses metonymy as well. The writer uses the name of the companies to write about the people and the representatives in them. For example, he says that there is a battle between Apple company and Samsung company, while in fact, there is a battle between the representatives and their workers ( When the writer says that they are in battle, it's a figurative language).
The purpose of this article is to inform the readers about the Samsung Eletrocnis that may have surpassed Apple Market in the month of May. In order to do that effectively, the writer includes several rhetorical devices in the article. First of all, the most noticeable device is allusion, when he quotes Michael Walkley, the Canaccord Genuity analyst. It gives more credibility to the article, and it shows the reader that his argument is supported by an expert. Besides that, he uses metonymy as well. The writer uses the name of the companies to write about the people and the representatives in them. For example, he says that there is a battle between Apple company and Samsung company, while in fact, there is a battle between the representatives and their workers ( When the writer says that they are in battle, it's a figurative language).
Wednesday, June 5, 2013
39. No, Trayvon Martin Didn't Film His Friends Beating Up a Homeless Man
In this article Josh Voorhees writes on June 3rd, about how George
Zimmerman claims he did not video record two buddies of his beating up a
homeless man. Voorhees starts out his article by talking about the pre-trial
that happened in the past week, where the defense lawyer told the court that
Zimmerman took footage of his friends “beating up a homeless guy.” To
contradict the defense lawyer, Zimmerman’s team claims that he taped two
homeless men fighting over a bicycle. Voorhees then says that the revelation
did not come to much effect because the judge; Debra s. Nelson, had already put
restrictions on what the defense could and could not tell the jury about
Martin. This would restrict Zimmerman’s team of talking about how Martin used
drugs, being suspended from school and also past fighting events. Voorhees
continues to explain that this debate would still be decided and soon he would
be pronounced guilty or innocent. Voorhees ends by saying that the texts and
other footage that Zimmerman would have to be considered in as a second degree
murder. The defense team said that his finance would have to start at $75
million to give Zimmerman a chance at fighting.
In this article Voorhees rapidly talks about how Zimmerman and his
lawyers claim that the footage in his cellphone was two homeless men fighting
for a bicycle. Voorhees restates the full statement to emphasize the importance
of the trial and show how the Zimmerman’s lawyer had the right things to say,
to contradict what the defense attorney said against him. He also says that
since both sides want to prove Zimmerman’s innocence or guilt, they have been
trying to get the message out to the public. Voorhees to end his article, he
shows the price tag that the defense attorney ironically states, and then says “at
least $75,000, to give George a fighting chance." This is a very
short yet clean cut essay, where Voorhees states his thesis and provides
evidence for it. Although it is a very short article, he has a formal way of writing;
this also helps because he does not take any sides in his article. He shows
both sides of the trial and explains that both want to show the public what is
going on, and get their opinion.
Monday, June 3, 2013
39. Another Day, Another “Accidental” Child Shooting Death
On Friday, Slate Magazine's crime correspondent Justin Peters wrote about another "'accidental' child shooting death." The article talked about the author's viewpoint on the issue of adults, especially parents, owning guns. The beginning of the article referenced a recent child shooting death on Wednesday, in Tyler, Texas. Soon after, the author expressed, "Trenton Mathis didn't have to die." He further added that the death of the innocent child was the country's fault, its "indifference toward the basic principles of gun safety." He made it clear that he was criticizing both parents and the government of not taking precautious measures to prevent such disasters, thus causing him to consider them "accidental deaths" and revealing that "the frustrating thing is that they are preventable." Peters' solution ideas to prevent future deaths were soon followed by a list of "accidental deaths" that would continue to grow unless adults started to be more careful.
Peter's purpose for writing this article was to reveal his stand and opine about the issue of possessing handguns. His article seemed to be primarily directed to parents who own handguns at home as well as the government. The passage clearly calls for the adults' attention to keep the guns out of the children's reach and the government's concern to consider the issue more seriously. The choice of words contribute in building the author's tone, which would best be described as one of boldness and even criticizing. This is especially evident when Peters said, "His senseless death is a direct result of this country's baffling indifference toward the basic principles of gun safety," and "If you can't be bothered to take two minutes to unload your handgun and put it in a gun safe, then you shouldn't own a gun." Throughout the article, Peters' position regarding the issue was evident all thoughout ("It's a point I've made before, and it's one that I'll continue to make as long as children continue to die"). He did not only present the evidence that would contribute to his stand, but rather, also considered the opposition (such as the third paragraph). In addition, Peters used a point that would be used against him and turned it in such a way where he could further reinforce his argument.
38. Housebound
Writing about
whether having one parent always at home or not make is more efficient, Emily
Oster writes an article on June 3rd explaining that it doesn’t really
change anything. She starts off her article with a story of a friend of hers
from elementary school. She explains that his mom made the best cupcakes every,
in her opinion it’s the top 5 favorite dessert. Unlike her mother who would say
“Get the list first, and sign up for soda and f you miss…sign up for plates.” Oster goes on to explain that in her
house, her parents split everything 50/50. She explains that in a feminist view
the women is the one who does everything, but she says that after a cover story
at the Atlantic on gay marriage, they don’t have
this indifference because they don’t have any feminist baggage to worry about
and it’s not a good idea to have one. Oster then talks about her household, she
says that there are many people in her house like nanny, her, her husband, the
cleaning lady, and her daughter, but the difference that it all works is that
her and her husband split time between child care and work. While others only
do one at a time, which is not a very good choice. Oster ends her article
explaining that “specialization insight” doesn’t necessarily mean that one
parent has to be home all the time, but is certainly makes it easier.
In this article Oster uses irony in her writing, to illustrate her
opinion, making her point; that it doesn’t really make a difference, stronger
and vivid. She uses irony when talking about how her parents would split everything
“50/50” even the cooking, but she says that her dad was not any good at cooking
but they would still split everything with each other. She also uses irony to
end her article by saying that she does not blame her mother for not doing the cupcakes
but she does blame her for not getting someone else to do it for her. She also
ends her article by rephrasing her beginning point, in the beginning she talks
about how she loved Mikey’s moms
cupcakes but her preferred taking sodas or plates, then ends by saying she does
not blame her mom for this but she does for her mother not finding someone who
could do the cupcakes. Oster uses many of personal touches tough out her
article to interpret to the audience that she knows what she is talking about. Although
she uses personal pronouns, she maintains a formal diction, which enables her
audience to comprehend her and make her words flow.
37. The Starbucks of Pot
In
this article Dominic Holden writes an article on May 31st, about how marijuana
is becoming bigger and bigger and Barack Obama should let it prosper. He begins
the article by saying that Jamen Shively tore a page from the Starbucks handbook
and he realized that they have “high-end product that satisfies America`s
craving for a mild buzz.” He doesn’t end there, he continues to say that that
it is not coffee anymore, know the “high-end product” is pot. Holden says that
there is a project of $100 million investment to establish a new brand in an industry
that doesn’t exist. He goes on to show that states such as, Colorado and
Washington have already legalized marijuana, but he says that in California has
allowed marijuana for medical use. Holden also explains, if Obama tried to stop
the states from legalizing or authorizing the use of marijuana he would surely
loose legally and later on politically. Then Holden shows that ex President of
Mexico, Vicente Fox, wanted to legalize the use of marijuana, he says this
because he believed it would cut crime. Fox says that criminals would no longer
have the ability to gain money for pot, because they would be available
anywhere for a lower price. Holden expresses his feelings towards smoking
marijuana but he also says that it would be a good thing for the market, but
sellers would as for ID and would have to pay for taxes. Holden ends his
article by saying that if Obama and Holder tried to stop this progress, they
would not have anything to offer but more years of failed war on drugs, “the president and his attorney general should let them do
what the White House can’t—beat the black market at its own game.”
In this article Holden talks about the new upcoming market of
marijuana. He explains throughout his article the affects it has had in society
and explains the mad and good outcomes. He does allusions to Obama, Holder and
the ex Mexican President Fox. Holden does comparison and contras of the effect
the government would have if President Obama tried to confront the legalization
of marijuana in the states, he explains that if he tried he would loose. He
also shows the viewpoint of Fox to promote the legalization by saying that if
it where legalized, crime could be reduced. He uses statistics to make his
point clear. His diction is very formal and easy to understand, this makes his
article flow and easy to understand what he has to say. Over all, Holden
explains that he doesn’t agree with the smoking of marijuana, but he explains
that even so, it may be a very good outcome for the nation.
Sunday, June 2, 2013
39. 3 Veteran Storm Chasers Killed by Oklahoma Tornado
Three veteran storm chasers died in
the Great Plains. Tim Samaras and his son as well as a friend Carl Young, died
Friday with 13 others when an EF3 tornado with 165 mph winds hit them in
Oklahoma City. The Storm Prediction
Center in Norman, Oklahoma said, “They put themselves in harm’s way so that they can educate the public
about the destructive power of these storms.” Tim Samaras had told people
before that tornadoes were unpredictable. His brother said, ““I don’t know if I
would say I worried about it because one of the biggest things he stressed was
safety… He knew what to look for. He knew where not to be and in this case, the
tornado took a clear turn toward them.” Time Samaras had been featured on Discovery
Channel and received multiple meteorology grants. The Storm Prediction Center
was sad to hear of Samaras’ death, “Samaras was a respected tornado researcher
and friend … who brought to the field a unique portfolio of expertise in
engineering, science, writing and videography.” Since his death, those who knew
him remember Samaras’ bravery and love for his job.
Authors Kelly
P. Kissel and Thomas Peipert inform readers on more death tolls in the recent
tornado in Oklahoma. This time, it is a story of sorts about a storm chaser
named Tim Samaras. As such, they have quotes from family and people he worked
with. The article emphasizes the bravery and caution the late Samaras
practiced. The article even mentions the fascination of storms when Samaras was
young and watching The Wizard of Oz. There is a sad repetition of the fact that
Samaras died doing what he loved. Overall, the tone of the article is quite
somber.
39. How to Hold a Pen Correctly
http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2013/05/hovv-yov-ovght-to-hold-your-penne/276366/
Megan Garber, the author of the article " Hovv Yov Ovght to Hold Your Penne," basically presents with readers some writing tips and advice from 1611. The author talks about how writing itself is a difficult task - from getting a pen and writing symbols and signs to actually sitting on a chair. A long time ago, the physical act of writing was a form of technology since no one knew how to hold a pen, how to position the elbow, or how to position the paper. Richard Field published a book in 1611 called A Nevv Booke, containing all sorts of hands vsvally written at this day in Christendome, as the English and French Secretary, the Roman, Italian, French, Spanish, high and low Dutch, Court and Chancerie hands: with Examples of each of them in their proper tongue and Letter. Also an Example of the true and iust proportion of the Romane Capitals. Collected by the best approued writers in these languages. The book basically says to sit in an upright position, the elbow should not be too close or too far away from the body, and softly hold your pen.
The author uses several rhetorical devices. The author's purpose is informative (exposition). The tone and diction all point that the author has light humor regarding the book. The title of the article shows light humor as it is written as if it were in 1600s. The main point of the article is to talk about a book published in 1611 which not only has a funny and long name, but it's content is also very funny. The article itself is structures as a how-to organization; it shows how the book describes how to perform the act of writing correctly. The author includes quotations from the book and then plays with the different language with the last sentence to create a sense of humor: "Hold your pen 'very gently in the hand without gripping," because to fail to do this would mean that "command of hand' gets 'vtterly lost.'"
Megan Garber, the author of the article " Hovv Yov Ovght to Hold Your Penne," basically presents with readers some writing tips and advice from 1611. The author talks about how writing itself is a difficult task - from getting a pen and writing symbols and signs to actually sitting on a chair. A long time ago, the physical act of writing was a form of technology since no one knew how to hold a pen, how to position the elbow, or how to position the paper. Richard Field published a book in 1611 called A Nevv Booke, containing all sorts of hands vsvally written at this day in Christendome, as the English and French Secretary, the Roman, Italian, French, Spanish, high and low Dutch, Court and Chancerie hands: with Examples of each of them in their proper tongue and Letter. Also an Example of the true and iust proportion of the Romane Capitals. Collected by the best approued writers in these languages. The book basically says to sit in an upright position, the elbow should not be too close or too far away from the body, and softly hold your pen.
The author uses several rhetorical devices. The author's purpose is informative (exposition). The tone and diction all point that the author has light humor regarding the book. The title of the article shows light humor as it is written as if it were in 1600s. The main point of the article is to talk about a book published in 1611 which not only has a funny and long name, but it's content is also very funny. The article itself is structures as a how-to organization; it shows how the book describes how to perform the act of writing correctly. The author includes quotations from the book and then plays with the different language with the last sentence to create a sense of humor: "Hold your pen 'very gently in the hand without gripping," because to fail to do this would mean that "command of hand' gets 'vtterly lost.'"
39. "Climate Change's Psychological Milestone"
http://www.slate.com/articles/health_and_science/new_scientist/2013/06/carbon_dioxide_at_400_parts_per_million_the_keeling_curve_milestone_measurement.html
On June 2, 2013 Catherine Brahic wrote an article to Slate newspaper about the climate changes the world is now facing. Brahic interviewed scientist Ralph Keeling and he explains why it is important to measure CO2. Scientist Keeling said that every year the concentration goes up by 2 ppm per year. With the rise of this, he believes that the sea levels have dropped significantly, forests have become smaller, and now more sea ice. He also believes that we are in a climate danger zone because the concentration is now 400 ppm when it was first 280 ppm. When Brahic asked Keeling if these levels can drop again, he said that their is a possibility, however the possibility of the concentration staying the same or rising is much greater.
This article has a few rhetorical devices that you are able to catch right away. The first one is the fact that this article is based on an interview gathered directly from the scientist, Ralph Keeling himself, which makes the importance of the information much greater. With that said, the author uses the interview to his advantage and is able to ask personal questions about his father's invention and what he is doing to make sure it keeps on working. Also, the author is able to get straight to the point. Instead of developing 30 questions to ask, she figures out a way to get everything answered in 10 which does not bore the reader.
37. America's Top Colleges Have a Rich-Kid Problem
http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2013/05/americas-top-colleges-have-a-rich-kid-problem/276195/
On the article published on May 24, Jordan Weissmann addresses the issue of Top Colleges consisting mostly of students from wealthy families and criticizes their systems of lacking diverse economic levels within the school communities. By beginning with a graphical set of statistics on the Socioeconomic Distribution at Colleges, by Selectivity, Weissmann presents the audience with evidence of his arguments later on in the article. By this, the audience is likely to quickly absorb and understand the claims and implications without questioning the validity of the information. Weissmann notes the problematic issues that follow this trend, supporting why this socioeconomic distribution in colleges is a troubling fact. For instance, he states, "If you think that higher education should be a ladder for upward mobility, then you should regard these numbers as a disgrace." Wiessman continues to use logos by referring to numerical data, other writers and experts, such as Josh Freedman, who had written about the high costs of Universities, the economists Caroline Hoxby and Christopher Avery, and the circle graph on "High achievers by family income quartile."
Jordan Weissmann discusses this topic of the lack of economic diversity in colleges to alert the public, and perhaps even the colleges, about its unfairness to the poorer but still intelligent students who do not have equal opportunities as the rich students. His article does not require a higher level of education to be understood, and his audience consists of the general readership, especially adults and young adults directly affected by the issue. Weismann successfully informs and concerns the audience with his main use of logos and a easily comprehensible tone of assertion.
On the article published on May 24, Jordan Weissmann addresses the issue of Top Colleges consisting mostly of students from wealthy families and criticizes their systems of lacking diverse economic levels within the school communities. By beginning with a graphical set of statistics on the Socioeconomic Distribution at Colleges, by Selectivity, Weissmann presents the audience with evidence of his arguments later on in the article. By this, the audience is likely to quickly absorb and understand the claims and implications without questioning the validity of the information. Weissmann notes the problematic issues that follow this trend, supporting why this socioeconomic distribution in colleges is a troubling fact. For instance, he states, "If you think that higher education should be a ladder for upward mobility, then you should regard these numbers as a disgrace." Wiessman continues to use logos by referring to numerical data, other writers and experts, such as Josh Freedman, who had written about the high costs of Universities, the economists Caroline Hoxby and Christopher Avery, and the circle graph on "High achievers by family income quartile."
Jordan Weissmann discusses this topic of the lack of economic diversity in colleges to alert the public, and perhaps even the colleges, about its unfairness to the poorer but still intelligent students who do not have equal opportunities as the rich students. His article does not require a higher level of education to be understood, and his audience consists of the general readership, especially adults and young adults directly affected by the issue. Weismann successfully informs and concerns the audience with his main use of logos and a easily comprehensible tone of assertion.
39. Fears of Google Glass Are Unfounded
http://ideas.time.com/2013/05/22/fears-of-google-glass-are-unfounded/
There has been a lot of buzz around the production of the Google Glass. Many people seem to be put off by the new gadget, as they see that it produces a threat to privacy and things alike. The author, Brad Keywell, provides many reasons throughout the article over how many arguments against Google Glass are biased and untrue. While people seem to be scared about their privacy, it has been diminished greatly in public places with the invention of the security camera. There are also many other things, such as phones, that can take pictures and videos without anyone knowing. With the Google Glass, voice commands are necessary for it to preform any of the privacy-deteriorating functions. Back in the day, the Kodak camera was banned from places for similar reasons, we can see how that worked out now.
In order to show that the release of the Google Glass may not be as bad as the public thinks, Keywell also wants to teach his readers that we need facts to back up our fears and assumptions. Through evidence and many historical facts, he does this. Also, by pointing out other things that impose on our privacy, Keywell makes a good point. Overall, his article is strong and very convincing ending with a quote from Helen Keller, "The heresy of one age becomes the orthodoxy of the next," kind of like the Kodak camera.
There has been a lot of buzz around the production of the Google Glass. Many people seem to be put off by the new gadget, as they see that it produces a threat to privacy and things alike. The author, Brad Keywell, provides many reasons throughout the article over how many arguments against Google Glass are biased and untrue. While people seem to be scared about their privacy, it has been diminished greatly in public places with the invention of the security camera. There are also many other things, such as phones, that can take pictures and videos without anyone knowing. With the Google Glass, voice commands are necessary for it to preform any of the privacy-deteriorating functions. Back in the day, the Kodak camera was banned from places for similar reasons, we can see how that worked out now.
In order to show that the release of the Google Glass may not be as bad as the public thinks, Keywell also wants to teach his readers that we need facts to back up our fears and assumptions. Through evidence and many historical facts, he does this. Also, by pointing out other things that impose on our privacy, Keywell makes a good point. Overall, his article is strong and very convincing ending with a quote from Helen Keller, "The heresy of one age becomes the orthodoxy of the next," kind of like the Kodak camera.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)