http://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2013/05/boy-scouts-recognize-gay-boys-as-equal/276186/
In an article for The Atlantic, James
Hamblin wrote on May 23rd about Boy Scouts’ acceptance of gay boys. He opens up
by stating what opposition has said about the issue and then gives some
information about the circumstances in which the voting to approve the
resolution occurred. Although the author says that the resolution was passed
because of outside pressure, he supports the decision since the boy scouts is
“a massive organization that professes values of a good, moral life” and should
not distance itself from such a minority group. Hamblin says that the boy
scouts do not accept gay adults, but points out that “it will only be a matter
of time before adoption of this policy leads to integration of gay adult
leaders.”
James Hamblin’s purpose in writing this
article is to inform his readers about the acceptance of gay boys in the boy
scouts, but he also wants to persuade them to believe that it was a good
decision. The article is effective in presenting information since it uses
quotes and details, but it does not do a good job in persuading his audience to
reflect on how the resolution won’t inject “hypersexuality and gay activism
into a youth organization” as said in the beginning of the article. It does not
present a lot of convincing evidence to support this claim and some parts of
the article are a little confusing to understand. However, the overall tone and
style employed is still effective to convey the author’s position in the
situation.
No comments:
Post a Comment